In our guides to buying graphics cards under € 500, the GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 6600 XT came out on top. We will briefly review the capabilities of these two models to help you make the right choice.
Supply is just as complex as the graphics card market, with these very strong tensions that can’t fail to push up prices. However, through perseverance, some are still able to equip themselves. Due to the prices charged, many are moving towards mid-range models, which are very popular in our comparison. Among the greens (Nvidia), it is the GeForce RTX 3060 that dominates the buying guide for the best cards for gaming under 500 €, while among the reds (AMD), the Radeon RX 6600 XT does not remain . Between the two, the price difference is always marginal. In this context, which to choose?
AMD’s advantage in rasterization, Nvidia in raytracing
To find out, obviously you have to go through our individual tests (both are now given 3 stars) but also consider aspects that are broader than raw performance. Is AMD’s Navi 23 GPU, with RDNA 2 architecture, able to shake the GA106 with Nvidia’s Ampere architecture? In Full HD (1080p) and in rasterization (the classic rendering mode for video games), the RX 6600 XT wins against the RTX 3060 by 9% according to our performance index. One difference, still in favor of the AMD card, is only 3% of the WQHD (1440p). Is it packaged weighed? Things are obviously more complicated than that.
More and more games are offering raytracing rendering. Granted, it is still far from becoming a fully democratic part, but the gain in translation quality is real and there is no doubt that in the future, more and more graphic engines will use this technology. . Even if it means changing the graphics cards, you can see how these two behave in this exercise. Verdict: activating raytracing has a greater impact on AMD card performance than its competitor from Nvidia, which is clearly ahead. Whether in Full HD or WQHD, with raytracing functionality, the RTX 3060 performs almost 60% better than the RX 6600 XT.
Nvidia, has always been at the forefront in terms of software
In addition, the advances shown in Nvidia’s DLSS technology (which improves performance by limiting quality losses) in AMD’s FSR (whose recent arrival in version 2.0 still promises to save life), reminds us that – in general – the ecosystem of Nvidia technologies and The Drivers to date is more than what AMD can do, despite all the efforts in this area. A software background that, by itself, doesn’t make a specific choice, but there’s a good chance of striking the balance on Nvidia’s side between two products with the same performance and features. price.
For information, you should also know that the AMD card is likely to consume less power than the Nvidia card (190 W versus 170 W in our tests), which leaves a small margin for different manufacturers (though for offering quieter versions, or overclocking components in search of more performance).
Little advantage for Nvidia, especially if the RTX 3060 is cheaper
Finally, at roughly the same prices, we advise those who want to optimize their rasterization performance to go for an AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (especially if they’re playing Full HD), but those approaching question from a small width. perspective (raytracing, drivers, software package) on choosing a GeForce RTX 3060 from Nvidia. Some merchants as well have more access to the latter, sometimes at more competitive prices depending on the model, which may convince some to enter their credit card number at an online merchant.